Kites or Balloons?

I had a conversation today with a good friend of mine who as struggling spiritually after having read Nietzsche for one of her classes. Nietzsche’s arguments against morality and religiosity were intellectually compelling for her. I prepared a lesson this past weekend on free agency which had me thinking about the nature between keeping the commandments and remaining free. A metaphor that I’d over heard over the summer came to mind. We are like a kite flying in the air. We are lifted higher as the person with the string releases more and more. If the string holding the kite up is cut, the kite falls precipitously to the ground. In contrast, we all know what happens to a balloon cut loose. Balloons tend to fly higher and higher (eventually popping, but lets keep that out of the metaphor). If we consider the string to be our connection to God or our sense of morality, then the question is which of these metaphors more accurately describes mankind.

In my view, the answer is that we are more analogous to the kite than to the balloon. I take this view for several reasons. First of all, I have seen the personal effect in my life of loosing that spiritual mooring. I’ve felt the downward cycle even as it deceptively slowed to resemble a natural dip. I don’t view my self as exceptional in this regard at all. Instead, I feel that humans cut from their moorings tend to collapse. I also look to the status of societies taken to Nietzsche’s ideal more fully. I consider the status of Nazi Germany a culture which idolized his ideal. I consider Randian libertarianism and its corrosive impact on American morality. These things combined make me believe that moral grounding of some sort is absolutely necessary to keep us up. Our sense of regard for others and intuitive morality does not hold us back but rather keeps us suspended like a kite.

Of course, the counter argument would be to look to European societies where faith in god is decreased while social utility increased. Yet, I would certainly argue that the traditions of compassion and community have their rooting in thousands of years of strong religious community. Moreover, they are about as far away from a Nietzchian ideal as humanly possible. We can have a totally different discussion about whether God is necessary for the development of said moral sense or merely its proximal cause. Yet, it is hard to argue that the kind of morality that Nietzsche views as repugnant is absent from these highly structured welfare societies.


2 thoughts on “Kites or Balloons?

  1. Wait? How could Nietzsche be the focus of Nazi Germany when Nietzsche criticized both anti-semitism and nationalism?

    Oh right, selective reading of Nietzsche. The Nazis did it as well.

    While the concept of the overman and of casting of slave and master moralities can be twisted by whatever devious parties, it is not necessarily the case that these things are totally repugnant.

    • Nietzsche can condemn anti-semitism all he wants, but his dislike of judaism permeates throughout. I don’t think its his writings per say but the mores and attitudes that one derives from his philosophy that form a core for Nazism. Of course, writers will be abused and their names maligned by such associations. The name of Darwin has suffered greatly and unjustly because of Social Darwinism. Yet, the big difference for me is that Nietzsche was a philosopher that positively argued for a certain world view and orientation. Thus, the practical application of that view can more fully be linked to him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s