Weeping along with God

IOne of the most remarkable passages of scripture is that found in the dialogue between Enoch and God found in Chapter 7 of the Book of Moses. Indeed, I recently read Terryl Givens remarkable book “The God Who Weeps” which takes its title and central message from this powerful passage. The God revealed by the Prophet Joseph Smith is one that takes an active part of the world he has created and is far from the detached God of Deist conception. Indeed, God is not removed from feeling sorrow and sadness or happiness and joy! 

 

28 And it came to pass that the God of heaven looked upon theresidue of the people, and he wept; and Enoch bore record of it, saying: How is it that the heavens weep, and shed forth their tears as the rain upon the mountains?

 29 And Enoch said unto the Lord: How is it that thou canst weep, seeing thou art holy, and from all eternity to all eternity?

 30 And were it possible that man could number the particles of the earth, yea, millions of earths like this, it would not be a beginning to the number of thy creations; and thy curtains are stretched out still; and yet thou art there, and thy bosom is there; and also thou art just; thou art merciful and kind forever;

 31 And thou hast taken Zion to thine own bosom, from all thy creations, from all eternity to all eternity; and naught but peace,justice, and truth is the habitation of thy throne; and mercy shall go before thy face and have no end; how is it thou canst weep?

 32 The Lord said unto Enoch: Behold these thy brethren; they are the workmanship of mine own hands, and I gave unto them their knowledge, in the day I created them; and in the Garden of Eden, gave I unto man his agency;

 33 And unto thy brethren have I said, and also given commandment, that they should love one another, and that they should choose me, their Father; but behold, they are without affection, and they hate their own blood;

 34 And the fire of mine indignation is kindled against them; and in my hot displeasure will I send in the floods upon them, for my fierce anger is kindled against them.

 35 Behold, I am God; Man of Holiness is my name; Man of Counsel is my name; and Endless and Eternal is my name, also.

 36 Wherefore, I can stretch forth mine hands and hold all thecreations which I have made; and mine eye can pierce them also, and among all the workmanship of mine hands there has not been so great wickedness as among thy brethren.

 37 But behold, their sins shall be upon the heads of their fathers; Satan shall be their father, and misery shall be their doom; and the whole heavens shall weep over them, even all the workmanship of mine hands; wherefore should not the heavens weep, seeing these shall suffer?

 

There is a stereotype in our culture that crying is not ‘masculine’ and that men should not cry. However, if the God of the universe is not beyond feeling sorrow and crying, neither should we be. Christ likewise wept on several occasions including the death of Lazarus and from joy during his visit to the Nephites.

I’ve been thinking a lot about crying, because I have noticed recently that since my conversion and baptism and especially since my mission I find it much easier to tear up when reading particularly happy or sad stories. Indeed, I have become a bit of a sucker for emotional movies that I once would have viewed as emotionally manipulative and really disliked ( Things like Charly or a Walk to Remember come to mind). When I read  in the Ensign stories of converts who struggle alone in the church until miraculously their families hearts are softened, I begin to tear up with great ease. In the past few weeks, reading the profiles of those precious children lost at Sandy Hook also brought many tears of sorrow to my eyes.

One experience early on in my mission really stands out to me in this regard: One day, we were tracting in part of our area without a lot of success. A man opened the door and it was immediately obvious that he was in a bad mood. Indeed, when I mentioned that I was a missionary, he began to criticize and exclaim how he does not believe in God. I asked him why, and he explained that his wife had recently tragically died and therefore he knew God could not exist. He quickly slammed the door before I could say too much more. My companion and I began to walk away, when I was overwhelmed with a sense of love and compassion that brought tears to my eyes. I could feel how much God loved that man and also knew that his wife was up in heaven looking down upon her husband with tears of compassion. I felt strongly prompted to knock on his door again, and when he opened I bore testimony that I knew his wife loved him and that he could once again see her again. He was stunned when I told him that and was obviously moved almost to tears. I asked him for his phone number to try to follow up with him, and he give it to me and then closed the door. He never actually answered the phone or agreed to meet with us, but it was still one of those experiences that I will never forget because of the empathy and love that I felt for this complete stranger.

I’d been thinking a lot about how becoming more like Christ inevitably involves also feeling more empathy and more “Sorrow For Sin,” when I stumbled upon a the words of an Apostle (Marvin j. Ashton) which clearly labels the ability to cry as a gift of the Spirit!

“Let us review some of these less-conspicuous gifts: the gift of asking; the gift of listening; the gift of hearing and using a still, small voice; the gift of being able to weep; the gift of avoiding contention; the gift of being agreeable; the gift of avoiding vain repetition; the gift of seeking that which is righteous; the gift of not passing judgment; the gift of looking to God for guidance; the gift of being a disciple; the gift of caring for others; the gift of being able to ponder; the gift of offering prayer; the gift of bearing a mighty testimony; and the gift of receiving the Holy Ghost.”

Whenever we are able to feel compassion and charity that is a gift from God. Another favorite scripture comes to mind (Moroni 7:48)

 48 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, pray unto the Father with all the energy of heart, that ye may be filled with this love, which he hath bestowed upon all who are true followers of his Son, Jesus Christ; that ye may become the sons of God; that when he shall appear we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is; that we may have this hope; that we may be purified even as he is pure. Amen.

I’ve noticed that as I grow in love towards someone, my feelings of charity and empathy tend to grow. Recently, my Fiance had a minor procedure done to her foot and was in quite a bit of pain. As I comforted her and gave her a blessing, I could literally feel some of the pain that she was feeling. That pain made me want to hold her a bit closer and to comfort her as much as possible. I can only imagine what God, who loves each of us perfectly, must feel when we suffer.

As we grow to become more like God, our bowls will be filled with mercy and charity towards all.

 

Children of God?

Congrats to fellow seminarian Justin White for an excellent write up on his Seminar presentation featured in the Mormon Times . Justin’s presentation was among the most intellectual stimulating and really makes one question the basic foundations of our ‘I am a Child of God’ theology.

I however, found Justin’s conclusion to be rather unconvincing as it currently stands for several reasons. First of all, I don’t think the Justin fully acknowledges the full impact of the thought in “O My Father” and how deeply that theological notion permeated the culture. This notion of literally being children of God was not uniquely found in that famous poem, however. Parley Pratt for Instance expressed a very similar thought in the Poem “My Dearest Wife” Contained in Chapter 44 of his autobiography

“Why wander far from Heaven’s eternal fold

And from the bosom of your Father there?”

Indeed, this poem most emphatically rejects the notion of a cold and distant figure and embraces the notion that our father loved us during the preexistence.  Bosom is a very paternal/maternal term that does not seem to imply adoption or any loose form of association.

Secondly, I think that Justin should grapple more with historic concepts of Christianity that existed in the contemporary environment. There was great debate over this very issue. For instance, the Christian Repository had a headed debate in its 6th volume between a minister arguing that mankind and God have a special relationship and another arguing that ” Men are no more children of God than the beasts, only as they are the children of the resurrection.” This was going on in the 1820′s right around the time of the translation of the Book of Mormon etc. Significantly, the early saints seem to come down on the side those believing in a special relationship on all the key issues such as agency and the universal nature of the resurrection of the body.  In other words, historically the early Saints seem to align themselves theological with those that rejected the notion that our only relationship to God comes through adoption.

These I suppose are my two major points of contention. The third comes from the timeline of the symposium research culminating in essentially 1844. It does not make sense to consider this topic without at least looking at the spirit procreation ideas that emerge under Brigham Young. Justin seems to suggest that as we move on to the temple and focus on adoption, that adoption theology becomes more prominent and yet there’s the parallel increased focus on procreation and being children of God. I think that the historical evolution of the doctrine must be traced at least a little further in order to be fully understood.

Program for the Mormon Scholars Foundation Summer Seminar Symposium, July 8, 2010

Thanks to Jared at Juvenille Instructor and Terryl Givens for posting the information:

As one of the participants I repost the information and urge everyone that can to attend. I will be speaking about the fall of the earth, its plan of salvation and the role of Zion in reclaiming paradisical glory.

Program for the Mormon Scholars Foundation Summer Seminar Symposium, July 8, 2010
The Mormon Scholars Foundation Summer Seminar, hosted by the Neal A. Maxwell Institute, under the direction of Richard Bushman and taught by Terryl Givens, will present the quasi-annual MSF Symposium.

Date: Thursday, July 8.

Location: Auditorium of the McKay Building, BYU Campus

Time: 9:30-12:00 and 2:00-4:30

Symposium Theme: The Foundations of Mormon Theology

Ten seminar students from around the country will present the results of their research into the formative years of LDS theology. Presented topics will range from Eliza Snow’s theological poetry to racial amalgamation in early LDS thought to Joseph Smith’s appropriation of Johannine language. A ten minute Q&A will follow each 20 minute presentation. The public and BYU community are cordially invited.

Schedule:

9:30 Amanda Hendrix-Komoto

10:00 Dallin Lewis

10:30 Jared Tamez

11:00 Justin White

11:30 Daniel Ortner

12:00 Lunch/Break

2:00 Dave Golding

2:30 Elizabeth Pinborough

3:00 Jacob Rennaker

3:30 Blair Hodges

4:00 Nick Frederick

Summer Seminar on Mormon Theology 2010: Early Mormon Theology

Joseph Smith Summer Seminar 2010: Early Mormon Theology

I am a participant in the 2010 Summer Seminar at the Maxwell Institute. Several other more notable bloggers are involved in the program including Blair Hodges from Life On Gold Plates and Elizabeth and Jared from Juvenile Instructor. I am a bit behind in starting to blog about the seminar, but I certainly plan on sharing insights from the experience over the next few weeks.

It’s thus far been a real pleasure to be able to meet so many more experienced and extraordinarily talented Mormon Scholars. I am humbled by their knowledge of the bibliographical works and their expertise. I have been especially inspired as I’ve been able to listen to Terryl Givens and soak up his remarkable insights.

The chief theme that has impressed itself upon me this past week is how exciting the field of Mormon Studies is today. I don’t think I grasped the full breadth of high quality works being picked up by large scale publishing companies such as Oxford Press. Our seminar meets at the Maxwell Institute and so I’ve been exposed to the breadth of their publications as well. We visited the Church History Library this week and I was also amazed by the dedication to scholarship that I saw there.

I feel overwhelmed as a contemplate making my own tentative first contributions of the field.  I am between a couple of prospective topics at the moment for the symposium that will be in Provo on July 8th: I may either write about the concept of providential history versus agency, theodicy and explanations for suffering or on the concept of certainty and revelatory truth versus fact based intellectual knowledge in the early church.

Any guidance or insights on any of these topics would of course be immensely appreciated.

Deciding To Serve

Deciding to serve

After I finished watching Schindler’s List the other day, my father asked me what the movie made me feel. He was obviously wondering what it made me feel about Judaism and my conversion. It made me feel a great sense of tragedy at the fact that human beings are capable of such horrific actions. Even though god is able to use such events for good, they are purely evil and should cause us to weep with sorrow. The persecution of the Jews at the hands of Christians has been a horrific example of our failure to live up to the standard of God.

Yet, as I already wrote about in my post on Schindler and Discipleship, the thing the film actually reinforced in me was my need to do more with my talents and energies to help others. Truthfully, more than anything else the film reconfirmed my desire to serve a full time mission. If Schindler were willing and able to bring himself to bankruptcy and to risk his life in order to do good, what kind of a supposed disciple would I be were I unwilling to sacrifice a couple of years and some supposed financial security in order to serve the lord.

I have also been reading Terryl Givens People of Paradox and was again struck by the sacrifices of the pioneers. They were willing to give up so much in order to build up the kingdom. I am not asked to give nearly as much. I know that I would gain as much as I give from the process. I know that I would be able to help others and to make a real difference in the Lord’s kingdom.

What is holding me back?

I still have months to make a final decision and I know that I will be torn back and forth because I am too weak to decide once and for all.